Safeguarding

Support and services have been withdrawn from families at the same time as intrusive and coercive intervention has been stepped up. Children and their families are suffering considerable harm as a result.

“Social work in child protection is no longer part of the solution to cruelty to children – it has become part of the problem.”

“There has been a steady increase in the numbers of families experiencing investigations for suspected abuse in the last decades, the majority of which do not appear to uncover actual abuse and do not result in help being offered to families.”

Vanishing rights

Social work involves some of the most intrusive actions it is possible for the State to take and children and their families’ human rights are critical to protecting the most vulnerable. Yet ten years ago the government cut all mention of human rights from the governmental guidance. Without this framework both social work and wider safeguarding practices have become increasingly intrusive and harmful.

Children and families are being hurt by a system which should be there to protect.

“Indeed ‘human rights’ gets not a single mention. Not one. Human rights have been airbrushed out.”

Govt guidance: the erasure of
consent and rights from practice

The relationship between
state and family
has been rewritten

“When life falls apart, when your nightmares come true, when everything that you value is put at risk – you will find yourself facing systems and bureaucracies which you have never before encountered.”

Taliah Drayak, activist
PFAN: Letter of thanks to advocate

Punishing state

The state in the UK is both neglectful and intrusive and becoming ever more so. Families are blamed for their failure to cope in the difficult situations in which they have been placed.

Real problems of poverty in the face of escalating costs of basics, reduced access to support and services and increased pressures is repeatedly framed as poor parenting.

“Austerity measures have made people poorer, reduced community facilities and networks, and decimated the safety net and support available. At the same time there has been an increase of social services have increased the policing of those in need and coercive intervention into families.”

Professors Brid Featherstone, Anna Gupta, Kate Morris and Sue White
The British Journal of Social Work: Protecting Children: Towards a Social Model  (2018)

A punishing system: individuals
blamed for societal failure

Rising numbers of
intrusive investigations

Part of this intrusion, and focus on struggling individuals instead of the failures of government to provide what is needed, has been to insist that authorities need to know everything about children, their families and their lives.

Over the years what is included within ‘safeguarding’ has continuously expanded as has the levels of information about children being shared. Now not only is there a significant body of evidence as to the harm to children and their families – as warned there would be by civil liberties campaigners – but there’s also a shocking lack of any evidence that it actually helps children. Yet despite all of this the government now wants to go much much further in accessing and using children’s information and claiming it as wellbeing. 

Sharing isn’t safety: the attacks on children and families privacy 

Child removal

Removal of children from families is a drastic and damaging measure and must be a last resort. Instead, the consequence of our neglectful and punitive system is families being separated not supported. There is widespread concern that children are being removed when it shouldn’t be necessary.

“The impact of background economic conditions and the associated pressure on family situations may suggest that there is likely to be continued volume growth ahead.”

Rising numbers separated: government support
for removing children plus big profits

Rights in the
‘care’ system

Adoption focus
ignoring rights

Rights protect children

All of this ever increasing State monitoring and intrusion has not made things better for children. 

Children need help for their families, so that their families are able to care for them. This is what human rights frameworks – which the government have agreed to – say must be provided. And this support must be provided without trampling their rights to privacy, to protection of personal information and to family.

Rights for children must be at the heart of how we keep children safe. 

"Increasingly the tragedy of deaths of children, including Victoria, are used to justify measures which harm not help families. Support is needed with rights of children and families respected."

The Victoria Climbié Foundation UK

"We have no evidence that this child protection system actually protects children. What evidence there is at a systemic level seems to show that there is very little change in the numbers of children being harmed."

Professor Andy Bilson

 
"If we cannot judge whether more or less children should be subject to child protection measures or placed in out-of-home care, we cannot justify the very great powers that legislation confers on child welfare services."

Professor Paul Bywaters
Exploring inequalities in child welfare and child protection services.

“[serious case review] findings are frequently vague and general, but inevitably slanted towards more intrusive and coercive surveillance and data sharing without understanding of the wider impact on all cases."

Professor Lauren Divine and Dr Stephen Parker
Rethinking child protection strategy: Progress and next steps.and child protection services

“We should end child protection as we know it,
and make a fundamental
change from child rescue
to child rights that strengthens
family and community.” 

Professor Andy Bilson, Voice of the Child podcast